First Guns RSS

Everyone's been writing about us. Now we're speaking out. We're Thunder and Lightning, the First Guns. firstguns@gmail.com

Archive

May
28th
Thu
permalink

Emily Miller, Closet Feminist

Emily Miller is breathing a sigh of relief that Michelle Obama had no “feminist agenda” when it came to the President’s selection of a Supreme Court justice to replace David Souter. As evidence, she quotes Barack Obama on C-SPAN saying “I can’t tell you the number of women, including Michelle, who say choose the person you think is going to be best.”

We hate to break it to you, Emily, but this sentiment is entirely feminist in spirit. You have something in common with Michelle Obama! A shared agenda, even. Feminism is the belief that we are all equal, and we all deserve to be treated equally. This “equality” or “feminism” would allow us to move through life and earn respect based on our talents and experience without the biases and damage of sexism (and racism, and other isms).

Indeed, when you write that “In my career in politics and the media, I have never gotten a job because my boss needed a woman. I was hired for my hard work ethic, experience, intelligence, and skills,” you reveal quite a feminist leaning yourself! Feminists want everyone to have what you’ve had—a job history that is about your skills, not your gender.

It appears that Ms. Emily Miller, you are a feminist! Michelle will send you the coordinates for the next meeting—we hear Ruth Bader Ginsburg might step down next year, so we will be discussing her possible replacement. In the meantime, practice the handshake and welcome to the sisterhood.

Comments (View)
permalink

Sarah Haskins comes to the arm party. A little late, but we’ll take it.

Comments (View)
May
27th
Wed
permalink

Mother's Day Massacre

Just three quick things. We aren’t pulling punches these days.

Hey! Sally Quinn! Your Mother’s Day loveletter to us was sweet! And creepy! Seriously, a thousand words about Michelle being “young, strong, vigorous, intelligent, accomplished, sexual, powerful, embracing, and most of all, loving,” was, um, a lot. Also, no one is allowed to use “right to bare arms” ever again. Ever. We suspect you’ve succumbed to a Tracy Anderson-induced fear of “bulking” and are using weights far below what you can really lift. Try some arm raises with a 10-lb barbell in each hand and see how strong you can be on your own.

Hey! Bonnie Erbe! Your Mother’s Day poison pen piece was stupid! And dumb! First of all, you set up a false dichotomy between motherhood and being a “career woman.” As most women can tell you, feminism has allowed us to do both. Also, no one says “career woman” except people who wear sneakers with suits. Secondly, in case you hadn’t noticed, being First Lady is a full-time, hardcore job. Michelle didn’t “cave in” and turn her brain off. She’s pretty damn busy doing things like speaking at the UC Merced commencement, the White House Correspondent’s Dinner, appearing on the cover of Time magazine, appearing on Sesame Street, re-opening the American Wing at the Met, honoring those working to rebuild schools in New Orleans, reading to students, saying prayers for swine flu victims, visiting food banks, and visiting the Defense Department.

Also, despite your lack of reading comprehension, black women do have a different history, and fight different stereotypes than white women do. We think you’re not doing enough cardio. We suggest some treadmill work with the audio version of Ain’t I a Woman on your ipod.

Hey! Iman! Shut up!

We love you all—more soon!

Thunder and Lightning

Comments (View)
Apr
11th
Sat
permalink

First Guns Are Video Stars!

Thanks for making this!

T & L

Comments (View)
Apr
8th
Wed
permalink
Comments (View)
Apr
7th
Tue
permalink

Introducing: The Gun Project

We are so inspired by all of the comments and notes we have been getting from all of you strong people. So, in order to honor you, we are launching The Gun Project. Basically it means: We want to see your guns!

Show off your guns by submitting a photo to the First Guns flickr group. Please include some information about them. What do you do with your guns? Play piano, write protest songs, practice karate—tell us about it. No fitness requirement!

We’ll post some of the choice ones here on the blog.

Comments (View)
Apr
6th
Mon
permalink

On Meeting the Queen: Yeah, We Touched Her There

We’re back from Europe! You may have read about our trip, a few people wrote about it. Michelle wore Thakoon, J.Crew, Junya Watanabe, Jason Wu, Alaia, Michael Kors, and Isabel Toledo. Oscar de la Renta whined not being included. Busy Bee Cathy Horyn wrote a story about each outfit in the New York Times, which also provided a painstakingly detailed slide show. Is Horyn hoping to move to DC, like Robin Givhan? Also, since when is an argyle sweater “kooky”?

What really struck us about the press coverage of the trip was the way each event was treated as some sort of test for Michelle. Writers seemed obsessed with the many ways she might screw things up. The LA Times wondered if she would “upstage” her husband and expressed concern that we might appear. Gioia Diliberto at the Huffington Post was concerned about what she would wear to meet with the Queen. The Daily News reassured readers that she had studied royal protocols. The implication was that America ought to be biting its nails and rooting for Ms. Obama to not send us into World War III or something.

We wonder about the source of this preoccupation. We don’t recall a lot of handwringing about how Laura Bush was going to behave overseas, or Nancy Reagan, or even Hillary Clinton for that matter. Michelle Obama is a gracious, well spoken woman who has been in a high profile position for years now without a major gaffe. She’s not Joe Biden. It’s striking that so many writers chose to frame their coverage of the trip as though Michelle is an unknown, volatile person who could potentially embarass America somehow.

So why was Michelle at the center of this anxiety? What is it about her that is different from other First Ladies that might account for it? What could it be? We may have biceps for brains, but we have a pretty good idea, and it’s not because she is taller than Laura Bush.

Of course, Michelle performed perfectly, charming everyone with that blend of formality and accessibility that the Obamas do so well. Her one supposed faux pas, when we touched Her Royal Highness, was a warm response to the Queen’s overture and was recieved as such. And you know what? We are glad we did it! The Queen is a nice lady and we’ll touch her again if it’s appropriate. It’s not like we gave anyone an uninvited massage or anything.

Luckily, Triggerfinger and Li’l Rambler are no longer in office.

We all know that no reporting is neutral. It inevitably reveals the biases and frameworks of the writer, his or her editors, and the publication. But the hidden assumption that Michelle might screw up is notable, not only because it reveals the differing expectations journalists have about her, but because then when she doesn’t screw up, that is seen as a big deal as well. You could practically hear the sighs of relief when the trip was deemed a success. Phew!

We love Michelle, and we love it when others love her, but sometimes we worry that throught this dynamic she is going to begin to be seen as magical. The magical African-American First Lady who doesn’t offend people! We can send her overseas, and nothing bad happens! What will she do next? And that is just as offensive as considering her an underdog. She is a professional woman who is good at her job. Are we going to have to strongarm people into letting her do it?

Comments (View)
Apr
1st
Wed
permalink

We're Taking Our "Attitude" on the Road

Greetings from London! It’s been a busy and exciting trip—we met the Queen and gave her an ipod, which was pretty cool. She’ll probably use it on the elliptical. And Michelle is on a high—according to a recent Washington Post-ABC News survey, her favorability ratings are up to 76%, and she has made great gains with Republican in particular. We love that—biceps are all for bipartisanship.

But she hasn’t made inroads with every Republican. In the same Washington Post story, one Maxine Furlong is quoted saying that Michelle has a ways to go before she will be a “great first lady.” The problem, according to Ms. Furlong, is that Michelle has “this black woman’s attitude…” Note the ellipsis. The reporter, Lois Romano, freaking left it at that! Hello, Lois? The obvious followup is “What do you mean?” Because 99.9% of us think it means “She’s an uppity, angry black lady,” and if that is what Maxine Furlong meant, then put it out there, by all means. Don’t put an ellipsis in there to cover up the ugliness. It just makes you complicit.

Romano goes on to quote Furlong saying, “White girls have more insecurities, which is why they care more about being ingratiating. I’m not saying this is a bad thing—I like that about her—but she is just a very strong woman and that can come off as condescending.” So secure black women who aren’t being ingratiating are scary and condescending. Apparently, being a strong woman is a bad thing, at least if you’re Michelle Obama. If you are sassy old Barbara Bush, no problem. Remember how people used to say she was secretly pro-choice? Radical!

Michelle’s rise in the polls is, we believe, due in part to a necessary and calculated response to the racist and sexist smears that have been directed at her since she came to national attention. Barbara Bush’s rumor was that she was secretly pro-choice. Michelle’s were that she calls white people honkys and hates America. To counter this, she announced her intention to be the “mom-in-chief” and considerably softened up her image. (Though we must point out that we did not soften up.)

So we greet this poll with mixed feelings. Can Michelle be more than the First Mom? How much soup do we have to dole out before her attitude is considered acceptable? We are getting a little bored here in England, being all covered up and having to change outfits three times a day so that the networks and news outlets can cover Ms. Obama instead of the protests or the summit. People like Maxine Furlong and journalists who fail to call out the truth from them make our view of America a little bleak.

But please, attribute that quote to us and not Michelle. We wouldn’t want her to slip in the ratings.

Comments (View)
Mar
30th
Mon
permalink

The LA Times Believes in Strong but not Equal

Twice in two days, the Los Angeles Times has revealed an odd perspective about relationships—apparently they cannot exist between equals. If one partner is strong, the other is weak. If one succeeds, the other has fallen behind. If one has the spotlight, the other is in darkness.

First Andrew Malcolm posted this weird piece titled “Michelle’s Obama’s got buff arms, but can she do this?” In it he juxtaposes Michelle’s official photo (starring us) with an image of figure skating athletes Sinead and John Kerr in which Ms. Kerr is lifting Mr. Kerr. There is probably a crazy skating term for this but we don’t know what it is. Malcolm calls the photo “amazing,” and writes, “We got to wondering if Michelle Obama could do this with the newly elected commander in chief.”

We aren’t sure just what is so amazing about the photograph. We don’t follow skating, but it doesn’t seem that weird to us that at some point a coach thought, “Hey, let’s try something more interesting than one person always lifting the other one.” Furthermore, no one in figure skating appears to share Macolm’s amazement—we read numerous accounts of the Kerr’s performance, “an impressive OD that was part Lindy Hop and part West Coast Swing,” which earned them seventh place, but none of them mentioned this move. (Hilariously, we did find this in our research.)

We assume Malcolm finds this image “amazing” because he isn’t used to seeing strong women. He linked it to us because Michelle Obama is the only other strong woman he could think of (sorry, feminism!). And he made the assumption that since Michelle is strong, she probably tosses her husband around like a rag doll whenever she feels like it. Because, you know, that’s what strong women do. In fact in the very next post Malcolm, in writing about Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s trip to Mexico, referred, for no reason at all, to her “bruising assault” on then-candidate Obama during the campaign. Poor li’l Barack! He’s getting it from all sides.

Later the same day, another post went up, titled “Michelle Obama in Europe—could she upstage her husband?” Writer Joanna Neuman fears that Michelle could be her husband’s “biggest challenge,” on their forthcoming European trip, worrying that the First Lady could “emerge as the star of the show.” Neuman thinks the European press will love Michelle, much as they did Jacqueline Kennedy when she was First Lady, and that this will damage the work Our Leader is thre to do. Eek! We are sure the President is not sleeping over this! The economic crisis is clearly nothing compared to what might happen if people pay attention to his wife. And god knows what will happen if we show up!

A marriage, even the First Marriage, is not a zero-sum equation. The gain of one needn’t be at the expense of the other. This seems obvious to us, but we don’t work for the Times, which also ran a story on us and an opinion piece featuring us in the past two days, by the way. Barack’s nightmare of mega press coverage of his wife might be happening right here at home.

And yet, Mr. Obama seems unperturbed. Perhaps his famed equanimity comes at least in part from the knowledge that there is enough strength to go around. A strong man and a strong woman (or the gender arrangement of your choice) can be equal partners. Strong nations can join together to work for economic justice. Once you let go of the idea that someone has to lose, it might be possible for everyone to win.

That was extremely earnest. Time to drop and do 100.

Photo credit: Christine Cotter / Los Angeles Times

Comments (View)
permalink

Don't Feel Bad About Your Arms, Nora Ephron

Apparently Nora Ephron had some things to say about us when she was interviewed by Barbara Walters over the weekend. The Daily News reports it thusly:

“Julie & Julia” director Nora Ephron is “upset” about Michelle Obama’s sleeveless look - but not because she thinks first ladies shouldn’t show their arms. The truth is, she’s envious. “I had really great arms,” Ephron told Barbara Walters on Sirius XM, “and now it’s just too late.”


Oh Nora. You already wrote an entire book about your neck. Now it’s arms? We know a pep talk can’t cure what seems to be a serious body love problem, but lady, those arms wrote Silkwood. And Heartburn. And Cookie! (We’re ignoring You’ve Got Mail, Sleepless in Seattle, and Bewitched.) Those arms held your children. They’ve worn the wedding rings from all three of your marriages. You can put them around your cute husband.

Maybe you didn’t realize that older women can still get great benefits from working out. The Essentials of Exercise Physiology tells us that when 63 women in a nursing home began strength training, their muscle strength increased an average of 113% percent. That is not a typo. More than 100%! Imagine how great it would be to improve anything by that much.

Your quote made us sad, Nora. It distracted us from wondering why the hell two smart women like you and Barbara Walters were even discussing us. Seriously though, we hope you grab a couple of barbells, forget about what you’ve lost, and focus on all you’ve got to gain.

Comments (View)